UFC 75: Bisping vs. Hamill was bullshit
I’d been looking forward to the Michael Bisping vs. Matt Hamill match up since day one of The Ultimate Fighter Season 3. I actually couldn’t believe UFC 75 was going to be broadcast for free on SpikeTV. Hell, the Bisping-Hamill fight wasn’t even the top card. So I was stoked to watch three hours of MMA fighting Friday night. I mean, none of the best fights were going to be a repeat of Liddell vs. Sobral, right?
Was I disappointed in the actual fights I watched? No. Was I disappointed in the results of the fights I watched? Abso-fucking-lutely.
If you were able to catch the Bisping vs. Hamill fight, then you were probably impressed with how exciting it was. I was surprised with how much better Matt Hamill has gotten with his stand-up. Before the fight, I was a fan of both fighters. After the fight, I was just a fan of Hamill.
Let me explain. Hamill kicked Michael Bisping’s ass up and down the octagon. He bloodied Bisping’s face all to hell in the first minute of the fight. He took Bisping down at will in all three rounds. He landed more punches in all three rounds. He inflicted more damage in all three rounds. Guess who won? Michael Bisping by split decision. A fucking farce. We all sat there in front of the television slack-jawed. We couldn’t believe it. Did the judges watch the same fight we did?
It was surreal to watch Michael Bisping talk shit about being the real Ultimate Fighter champion with his face all swollen and bashed in, and then turn around and watch a sullen Matt Hamill, with the only evidence he was in a fight being a little cut above his nose, talk about how “I thought I won, but he beat me fair and square”.
This is exactly why I don’t ever watch boxing. The subjective, crooked-behind-the-scenes judging is everything that’s wrong with boxing, and now it’s found its way into the UFC. If Dana White doesn’t do something about this, I might have to start boycotting the UFC. I’ve never seen such an obvious decision go the wrong way. Sure, close fights are going to be called one way that some fans may not like. But this fight WASN’T EVEN CLOSE.
I don’t care what anyone says about “the official judging rules”, and that Bisping won because he had “better technique” and “better looking punches”. Better technique and better looking punches don’t amount to shit when you get thrown around the octagon by a deaf man-beast and have your face pulverized by “unorthodox punches”.
Apparently, Dana White thinks a rematch is a no-brainer. Which is good by itself, but it’s a lame consolation in my eyes.
On the flip side, the Quinton Jackson vs. Dan Henderson fight was great. I couldn’t believe both fighters went all five rounds. Jackson won by unanimous decision, and that one was even closer than the Bisping-Hamill fight, although I agree with the judges.
I think a real consolation prize for the fans would be Dana White to setting up a fight for Michael Bisping against either Quinton Jackson or Dan Henderson. Then we could all REALLY see him get his face smashed in.




