Comments on: 425 Feed Readers? Unpossible!

By: mojotek

mojotek — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:31:38 +0000

nicole: Whatever. You have got to have one of the most active commenting sections of any blog I know.

By: ngregory00

ngregory00 — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 03:10:11 +0000

*Jealous* I’d be shocked if I have FIVE!

COMPLETELY unrelated and totally left field: am I the only one unimpressed by Jay-Z’s comeback?

By: mojotek

mojotek — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:29:43 +0000

Riss: (In best Borat voice) Whhaaaaaaaaaaat? Niiiiice. I like. Maybe I make sexy face and you show me ‘old-fashioned’ click. Like my sister. High five!

By: Riss

Riss — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:15:37 +0000

I don’t use that new-fangled reader thing. I good old-fashioned click my friend.

By: mojotek

mojotek — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:06:27 +0000

yllwdaises: Awesome! I do miss me some BR4W… but I’m glad you think I’m that popular!

rockyjay: Oh I’m cherishing it alright… maybe it’ll turn into some crazy moola!

By: rockyjay

rockyjay — Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:07:24 +0000

I was wondering where my “readers” were — obviosly here!

Cherish the moment!

By: yllwdaisies

yllwdaisies — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:42:59 +0000

Just wanted to say, I’ve been reading your blog since I found you via ‘Blogs R 4 Wimps’ (in the days of Frodo Corleone). But I’ve never subscribed via the feeder. So, you have way more readers than that.

By: mojotek

mojotek — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:24:37 +0000

Dedd: Awwww… stop it. You’re making me blush.

By: Ignatius Dedd

Ignatius Dedd — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:51:13 +0000

hey, you deserve every one of those 425 subscribers, whether they exist or not!

hey, *I* subscribe.

By: mojotek

mojotek — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:44:54 +0000

Phoenix: Yup, you’re right. Nothing like carnage or sex to bring in the crowds.

By: The Phoenix

The Phoenix — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:45:40 +0000

Obviously, real and hillarious videos where shit either blows up, gets destroyed, or when something involves boobie draws a crowd.