<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill O&#8217;Reilly Gets Owned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/</link>
	<description>Where humor comes to die</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 04:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: So I&#8217;m a Pussy Huh? &#183; Gangstas &#38; Hugs</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-18180</link>
		<dc:creator>So I&#8217;m a Pussy Huh? &#183; Gangstas &#38; Hugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-18180</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, I&#8217;ve gotten a few comments from this guy/girl/douchebag on the Bill O&#8217;Reilly post. With the name &#8220;realitycheck&#8221;, he/she/it first informs me how it&#8217;s completely ridiculous to claim O&#8217;Reilly looked stupid when it was Letterman who made a fool of himself. OK, fine, fair enough&#8230; everyone&#8217;s entitled to their opinion/asshole or whatever. So I just wrote him a quick reply about how that&#8217;s a moot point. Well, apparently, he was expecting some very engaging political discourse with facts and points backing myself up. So now I&#8217;m a pussy. Please have a look-see for yourself: realitycheck (January 25th, 2006 at 3:14 am): I can&#8217;t believe we&#8217;re all talking about the same show. Letterman made himself look like a moron. Conservative and liberal analysts alike acknowledge that letterman contradicts himself. Dave asserts no facts, instead he merely insists that o&#8217;reilly is just making stuff up. You might disagree with o&#8217;reilly, but at least he has a sheet of facts, dave just says &#8220;I wasn&#8217;t aware&#8230;..I think you&#8217;re making stuff up&#8230;&#8230;..etc&#8221; In reality, its Letterman who dodges quetsions such as the &#8220;how do you think parents feel hearing sheehan calling terrorists freedom fighters&#8221; question. Letterman in fact admits defeat! He says &#8220;I&#8217;m not smart enough to debate you.&#8221; Also, &#8220;I don&#8217;t think you present fair and balanced&#8221; but then says &#8220;I don&#8217;t watch your show.&#8221; As far as applause went, the favor goes to Dave 6 times to 4. But if you were to just read their debate, Dave sounds like he should stick to movie stars from now on. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, I&#8217;ve gotten a few comments from this guy/girl/douchebag on the Bill O&#8217;Reilly post. With the name &#8220;realitycheck&#8221;, he/she/it first informs me how it&#8217;s completely ridiculous to claim O&#8217;Reilly looked stupid when it was Letterman who made a fool of himself. OK, fine, fair enough&#8230; everyone&#8217;s entitled to their opinion/asshole or whatever. So I just wrote him a quick reply about how that&#8217;s a moot point. Well, apparently, he was expecting some very engaging political discourse with facts and points backing myself up. So now I&#8217;m a pussy. Please have a look-see for yourself: realitycheck (January 25th, 2006 at 3:14 am): I can&#8217;t believe we&#8217;re all talking about the same show. Letterman made himself look like a moron. Conservative and liberal analysts alike acknowledge that letterman contradicts himself. Dave asserts no facts, instead he merely insists that o&#8217;reilly is just making stuff up. You might disagree with o&#8217;reilly, but at least he has a sheet of facts, dave just says &#8220;I wasn&#8217;t aware&#8230;..I think you&#8217;re making stuff up&#8230;&#8230;..etc&#8221; In reality, its Letterman who dodges quetsions such as the &#8220;how do you think parents feel hearing sheehan calling terrorists freedom fighters&#8221; question. Letterman in fact admits defeat! He says &#8220;I&#8217;m not smart enough to debate you.&#8221; Also, &#8220;I don&#8217;t think you present fair and balanced&#8221; but then says &#8220;I don&#8217;t watch your show.&#8221; As far as applause went, the favor goes to Dave 6 times to 4. But if you were to just read their debate, Dave sounds like he should stick to movie stars from now on. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Year Anniversary &#183; Gangstas &#38; Hugs</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-7365</link>
		<dc:creator>One Year Anniversary &#183; Gangstas &#38; Hugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-7365</guid>
		<description>[...] Bill O&#8217;Reilly Gets Owned - Ahh, I&#8217;ll do anything to piss on O&#8217;Reilly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bill O&#8217;Reilly Gets Owned - Ahh, I&#8217;ll do anything to piss on O&#8217;Reilly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojotek</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>mojotek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Let me list a few things for you since you brought up "losers in every facet of everyday life":

1.) You left a reply on a post that was dated 20 days prior because it seemed to have irked you so much.

2.) You came back to check on said comment the next day so you could leave another trite response at 3 o'clock in the morning (like your first comment).

3.) I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm going to assume you like Bill O'Reilly and actually eat his drivel up.

4.) You called me a pussy in a comment on a blog you have probably never been to, that is, &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; you happened upon this post that seemed to have gotten under your skin so.

Soooo... I'm completely comfortable with you saying I'm a loser in every facet of my life because I don't think I have to worry about shit.  Especially when it comes to being compared to your sorry ass (please see 1 through 4).  As for calling me a pussy, I can live with that too, because doing that in electronic form is something only people who have no recourse in the real world would do.  I'll go ahead and state the obvious that if you were standing right in front of me you would never say that to my face.  Or, alternatively, if you chose to say that to me against your better judgement then, well... there are plenty of people that would say "I told you so."

So, thanks, Mr. realitycheck... I think I like Bill O'Reilly now, and I'm so much better at debating a subject since you called me a pussy.  Now, in the words of Frodo Corleone: ¡No me jodas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me list a few things for you since you brought up &#8220;losers in every facet of everyday life&#8221;:</p>
<p>1.) You left a reply on a post that was dated 20 days prior because it seemed to have irked you so much.</p>
<p>2.) You came back to check on said comment the next day so you could leave another trite response at 3 o&#8217;clock in the morning (like your first comment).</p>
<p>3.) I&#8217;m going out on a limb here, but I&#8217;m going to assume you like Bill O&#8217;Reilly and actually eat his drivel up.</p>
<p>4.) You called me a pussy in a comment on a blog you have probably never been to, that is, <em>before</em> you happened upon this post that seemed to have gotten under your skin so.</p>
<p>Soooo&#8230; I&#8217;m completely comfortable with you saying I&#8217;m a loser in every facet of my life because I don&#8217;t think I have to worry about shit.  Especially when it comes to being compared to your sorry ass (please see 1 through 4).  As for calling me a pussy, I can live with that too, because doing that in electronic form is something only people who have no recourse in the real world would do.  I&#8217;ll go ahead and state the obvious that if you were standing right in front of me you would never say that to my face.  Or, alternatively, if you chose to say that to me against your better judgement then, well&#8230; there are plenty of people that would say &#8220;I told you so.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, thanks, Mr. realitycheck&#8230; I think I like Bill O&#8217;Reilly now, and I&#8217;m so much better at debating a subject since you called me a pussy.  Now, in the words of Frodo Corleone: ¡No me jodas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realitycheck</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>realitycheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-716</guid>
		<description>Typical ignorant response.  You basically just changed the subject.  You didn't refute any proof/fact/reality that dave made himself look like an ass, you basically made an excuse "its entertainment".  Well gee, thats kind of called a smoke screen, you can't call someone out on their politics, not back yourself up, and then say "oh its just a comedy show".  Thats called being a pussy, if you can live with that....well thats your perogative.  By the way he does say "I'm not smart enough to debate you" he never says I'm not up on current facts.  People who make excuses are losers in every facet of life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical ignorant response.  You basically just changed the subject.  You didn&#8217;t refute any proof/fact/reality that dave made himself look like an ass, you basically made an excuse &#8220;its entertainment&#8221;.  Well gee, thats kind of called a smoke screen, you can&#8217;t call someone out on their politics, not back yourself up, and then say &#8220;oh its just a comedy show&#8221;.  Thats called being a pussy, if you can live with that&#8230;.well thats your perogative.  By the way he does say &#8220;I&#8217;m not smart enough to debate you&#8221; he never says I&#8217;m not up on current facts.  People who make excuses are losers in every facet of life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojotek</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>mojotek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-701</guid>
		<description>realitycheck: Whether Letterman contradicts himself or not is a moot point.  It wasn't a political debate.  The Late Show is entertainment... and this interview really entertained me.  "Admits defeat"?  I hardly think so... he just admits that he isn't clear enough on political facts to have a real debate with O'Reilly, something O'Reilly should admit at the beginning of everyone of his shows.  O'Reilly's show isn't about political discourse, it's about providing entertainment for the hard right, and that's all he does.  He's neither intelligent nor a great debater in the slightest.  The fact that he tries to pass himself off as a journalist is what makes me so enjoy seeing him taken down a few pegs.  He's more rude and obnoxious every day on his own show than Letterman ever was to him in one interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>realitycheck: Whether Letterman contradicts himself or not is a moot point.  It wasn&#8217;t a political debate.  The Late Show is entertainment&#8230; and this interview really entertained me.  &#8220;Admits defeat&#8221;?  I hardly think so&#8230; he just admits that he isn&#8217;t clear enough on political facts to have a real debate with O&#8217;Reilly, something O&#8217;Reilly should admit at the beginning of everyone of his shows.  O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s show isn&#8217;t about political discourse, it&#8217;s about providing entertainment for the hard right, and that&#8217;s all he does.  He&#8217;s neither intelligent nor a great debater in the slightest.  The fact that he tries to pass himself off as a journalist is what makes me so enjoy seeing him taken down a few pegs.  He&#8217;s more rude and obnoxious every day on his own show than Letterman ever was to him in one interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realitycheck</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>realitycheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-688</guid>
		<description>I can't believe we're all talking about the same show.  Letterman made himself look like a moron.  Conservative and liberal analysts alike acknowledge that letterman contradicts himself.  Dave asserts no facts, instead he merely insists that o'reilly is just making stuff up.  You might disagree with o'reilly, but at least he has a sheet of facts, dave just says "I wasn't aware.....I think you're making stuff up........etc"  In reality, its Letterman who dodges quetsions such as the "how do you think parents feel hearing sheehan calling terrorists freedom fighters" question.  Letterman in fact admits defeat!  He says "I'm not smart enough to debate you."  Also, "I don't think you present fair and balanced" but then says "I don't watch your show."  As far as applause went, the favor goes to Dave 6 times to 4.  But if you were to just read their debate, Dave sounds like he should stick to movie stars from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe we&#8217;re all talking about the same show.  Letterman made himself look like a moron.  Conservative and liberal analysts alike acknowledge that letterman contradicts himself.  Dave asserts no facts, instead he merely insists that o&#8217;reilly is just making stuff up.  You might disagree with o&#8217;reilly, but at least he has a sheet of facts, dave just says &#8220;I wasn&#8217;t aware&#8230;..I think you&#8217;re making stuff up&#8230;&#8230;..etc&#8221;  In reality, its Letterman who dodges quetsions such as the &#8220;how do you think parents feel hearing sheehan calling terrorists freedom fighters&#8221; question.  Letterman in fact admits defeat!  He says &#8220;I&#8217;m not smart enough to debate you.&#8221;  Also, &#8220;I don&#8217;t think you present fair and balanced&#8221; but then says &#8220;I don&#8217;t watch your show.&#8221;  As far as applause went, the favor goes to Dave 6 times to 4.  But if you were to just read their debate, Dave sounds like he should stick to movie stars from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan-leonard.com/blog &#187; links for 2006-01-19</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>dan-leonard.com/blog &#187; links for 2006-01-19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-648</guid>
		<description>[...] Bill O&#8217;Reilly Letterman Video Watch Bill O&#8217;Reilly getting a thorough rimming by big Dave Letterman. Bring back Harvey Pekar, or Wogan &#8211; putting Johnny Ball through his paces&#8230;.. (tags: o&#8217;reilly letterman video) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bill O&#8217;Reilly Letterman Video Watch Bill O&#8217;Reilly getting a thorough rimming by big Dave Letterman. Bring back Harvey Pekar, or Wogan &#8211; putting Johnny Ball through his paces&#8230;.. (tags: o&#8217;reilly letterman video) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexKing.org</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexKing.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-608</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Around the Web&lt;/strong&gt;

# Gangstas &#38; Hugs - Bill OReilly Gets Owned
# Feedster Will Die in 2006
# Adobe Lightroom
# We Get Letters - great post on trust scores and communities.
# The Problems with Feeds at joshteeters.org
# August 2006: Finish Building Bar Extension -...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Around the Web</strong></p>
<p># Gangstas &amp; Hugs - Bill OReilly Gets Owned<br />
# Feedster Will Die in 2006<br />
# Adobe Lightroom<br />
# We Get Letters - great post on trust scores and communities.<br />
# The Problems with Feeds at joshteeters.org<br />
# August 2006: Finish Building Bar Extension -&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojotek</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>mojotek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Carol: I think you make a very good point.  Although, I'm sure most of that increased viewership was mainly just curiosity, as I'm betting a lot of David Letterman viewers don't usually watch O'Reilly and wanted to see what the numbskull was all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol: I think you make a very good point.  Although, I&#8217;m sure most of that increased viewership was mainly just curiosity, as I&#8217;m betting a lot of David Letterman viewers don&#8217;t usually watch O&#8217;Reilly and wanted to see what the numbskull was all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-550</guid>
		<description>I neither like nor dislike Bill O'Reilly.  I like David Letterman - I was even in his audience once a couple years ago which was fun.  However, the program with O'Reilly was exactly what both Dave and O'Reilly expected and wanted.  They knew going in that they disagreed on those issues.  After the show, the number of people watching "The O'Reilly Factor" increased substantially, and his younger viewership was up 20 percent over what it was in December.  Letterman just helped promote Bill O'Reilly's show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I neither like nor dislike Bill O&#8217;Reilly.  I like David Letterman - I was even in his audience once a couple years ago which was fun.  However, the program with O&#8217;Reilly was exactly what both Dave and O&#8217;Reilly expected and wanted.  They knew going in that they disagreed on those issues.  After the show, the number of people watching &#8220;The O&#8217;Reilly Factor&#8221; increased substantially, and his younger viewership was up 20 percent over what it was in December.  Letterman just helped promote Bill O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojotek</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>mojotek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Robguy: I loved Stewart's appearance on Crossfire!  I'll have to compare him on that and when O'Reilly was on The Daily Show.
-------------

moon: Thanks for the compliment... Happy New Year to you too!
-------------

ngregory00: Plant one on him for me too!
------------

Dear Jane: If he actually learned a lesson, I will be quite surprised.
------------

BigWinner: I couldn't agree more.
------------

JJ: Maybe it's cause you gotta work early like the rest of us. :)
------------

seramarlowe: Yeah, O'Reilly's show is just a farce as far as journalism goes.
------------

Laurie: I think O'Reilly should have electro-shock therapy for every time he says "turn his mic off!"
------------

Omnipotent Poobah: Seems he's only 'on top of his game' when he's in complete control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robguy: I loved Stewart&#8217;s appearance on Crossfire!  I&#8217;ll have to compare him on that and when O&#8217;Reilly was on The Daily Show.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>moon: Thanks for the compliment&#8230; Happy New Year to you too!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>ngregory00: Plant one on him for me too!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Dear Jane: If he actually learned a lesson, I will be quite surprised.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>BigWinner: I couldn&#8217;t agree more.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>JJ: Maybe it&#8217;s cause you gotta work early like the rest of us. :)<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>seramarlowe: Yeah, O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s show is just a farce as far as journalism goes.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Laurie: I think O&#8217;Reilly should have electro-shock therapy for every time he says &#8220;turn his mic off!&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Omnipotent Poobah: Seems he&#8217;s only &#8216;on top of his game&#8217; when he&#8217;s in complete control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omnipotent Poobah</title>
		<link>http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/rant/bill-oreilly-gets-owned/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Omnipotent Poobah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangstas-hugs.com/?p=105#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Must have made Bill ornery as hell not to be able to have Dave ordered off the set.

That Bill has a loofa between his ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must have made Bill ornery as hell not to be able to have Dave ordered off the set.</p>
<p>That Bill has a loofa between his ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.785 seconds -->
